{ feuilleton }

Avatar

• • • Being a journal by artist and designer John Coulthart, cataloguing interests, obsessions and passing enthusiasms.


 

Weekend links 181

eye.jpg

Cover of Eye no. 86 vol. 22, 2013, a type special. Detail from 1970s Letratone brochure, overprinted by character from the Marsh stencil alphabet.

The new edition of Eye magazine includes my essay on the evolution and aesthetics of steampunk. In the same issue Rick Poynor’s feature on the prints of Eduardo Paolozzi mentions a forthcoming book by David Brittain about the artist’s associations with New Worlds magazine in the 1960s. I designed the Paolozzi volume which will be published by Savoy Books in a few weeks’ time. More about that later.

Still on steampunk, KW Jeter notes its popularity among the younger crowd: “If some old fogey peering through his smudged bifocals can’t discern the cool and important stuff going on, such as the tsunami of anarchic multiculturalists using the steampunk scalpel to dissect the past and reassemble it like a two-dollar watch, that’s his loss; the readers are picking up on it.”

• Musicians interviewed: Rhys Chatham: “The reason I got into trumpet playing is because I wanted to play like [Black Sabbath guitarist] Tony Iommi.” | James Ginzburg: “One of the strongest feelings I had was that the act of sitting down and making dance music was like playing a video game…I felt disconnected from it…” | Julia Holter: “I love working with the voice, I love mystery, I love creating atmosphere.” | Roly Porter: “I sit at home and listen to folk and blues from before I was born. I listen to a lot of dub and reggae and classical music. These are all genres which to me seem really interlinked and influential.”

• At Kickstarter: From the director of Lovecraft: Fear of the Unknown, a short film entitled Do Not Disturb. “Two men are forced to share a motel room on a dark & stormy night. One man’s snoring starts to summon creatures into our world.”

The Notting Hill of the 1960s – with Moorcock’s marriage, children, celebrity, the editorship of New Worlds, the collaboration with JG Ballard, Brian Aldiss and the rest – became the proving ground for the shape-shifting Carnaby Street dandy Jerry Cornelius. But all the numerous Moorcock characters, those undying and born-again clones, have a part to play in his “multiverse”, a concept he developed alongside the earlier model suggested by John Cowper Powys. Moorcock’s astonishing catalogue of speculative fiction works to prove his key equation, which is based on meta-temporal parallel worlds drawn from HG Wells, Chaos Theory, String Theory, the Edgar Rice Burroughs of John Carter of Mars and the William Burroughs of Nova Express and the “Interzone”. Publishing all the strange rafts and pods of Moorcock’s prodigious science fiction and fantasy output, as Gollancz have done, is like assembling a ghost fleet, under the joint command of Dr John Dee and Admiral John Ford, with which to invade that uncertain continent we know as the past.

Iain Sinclair on the new series of Michael Moorcock editions from Gollancz.

• “What does science tell us about the relative dangers of drugs? Alcohol is by far the No. 1 most dangerous drug.” Some graphs from the American Enterprise Institute who no one would accuse of being a bunch of stoners.

• “I loved Eudora Welty, Flannery O’Connor, Katherine Ann Porter, Carson McCullers. There was a feeling that women could write about the freakish, the marginal.” Alice Munro at The Paris Review.

Elena Smith on Literary Parkour: @Horse_ebooks, Jonathan Franzen, and the Rise of Twitter Fiction. Related: Boris Kachka has a list of Everything Jonathan Franzen currently hates.

• Mixes of the week: Joseph Burnett compiles Adventures in Modern Jazz while Kier-La Janisse puts together a British Horror mix for Fangoria.

Explore the planet Mars, one giant image at a time.

• At BibliOdyssey: The Turner’s Manual.

A Crimson Grail (for 400 Electric Guitars) (2007) by Rhys Chatham | Arrakis (2011) by Roly Porter | City Appearing (2013) by Julia Holter | Debris (2013) by Faint Wild Light

 


 

Posted in {art}, {books}, {design}, {drugs}, {fantasy}, {film}, {horror}, {magazines}, {music}, {photography}, {science fiction}, {science}, {work}.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

 


 


 

4 comments or trackbacks

  1. #1 posted by Addison Hart

    gravatar

    Thought you’d have mentioned the Doctor Who discoveries somehow. Web of Fear seems right up your alley, given that it unfolds across a kind of palimpsest of London – the Underground. A psychogeographical horror story, if you will.

  2. #2 posted by John

    gravatar

    I’ve not been paying much attention, to be honest. While it’s nice that they’ve found more lost television I’m rather tired of hearing about Doctor Who in any form, and I say this as someone who receives a namecheck (as a spaceship designer) in Mike Moorcock’s Who novel.

    China Miéville made a good point about Who versus Quatermass (and other Nigel Kneale dramas) in the recent Kneale essay collection, something to the effect that Who was and still is made for kids so the drama often doesn’t hold up when watched as an adult. He goes into more detail than that but I agree with the general point. I enjoyed those things when I was a kid but have no interest in revisiting them.

    Oddly enough the Web of Fear serial is one of the first I remember seeing. I was only 6 at the time so the Yetis were terrifying, of course. If you want to pursue some psychogeographic connections, that serial was co-written by Henry Lincoln who later unearthed the Rennes-le-Chateau mystery which led to The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, and, eventually, The Da Vinci Code.

  3. #3 posted by Addison Hart

    gravatar

    Yeah, I’d kenned to that myself. Fascinating, really. I do think it shows as well – the concept of the monster is very much derived from readings of Ouspensky (in particular) and Blavatsky, I think. Fourth dimensional being that enters the three dimensional universe through the human mind in a transcendental meditative state, and all. Very much the kind of thing old PDO used to write about.

    I quite understand the point (especially when taken to the new stuff, which I rarely bother with), but there is something refreshingly dreamlike about these episodes in particular. I do actually think it holds up well with a lot of the contemporary and near-contemporary childrens’ telly of the period – Children of the Stones, for example.

  4. #4 posted by TJ

    gravatar

    I was only 6 at the time

    Punk.

 


 

tracker

 


 

“feed your head”