Richard Matheson, 1926–2013

matheson1.jpg

The Incredible Shrinking Man.

Of Richard Matheson’s many books I’ve only read I Am Legend so can’t say much about his fiction other than to confirm (as everyone else does) that none of the three adaptations so far have managed to do it justice. Of his work for film and television there’s too much to say, it’s so copious and indelibly memorable. Here’s a list of five favourite Matheson creations.

The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957)

JG Ballard frequently referred to this as one of his favourite science fiction films, not because of the SF element, which is never properly explained, but because of its inadvertent Surrealist qualities. For my part, every time I watched this I was always impatient to get to the later scenes where the unfortunate Scott becomes trapped in the cellar, and his own house becomes an increasingly alien and hostile environment. The ending where he accepts his condition is very Ballardian.

matheson2.jpg

Duel (1971)

A sweating and manic Dennis Weaver is pitted against an anonymous truck driver who remains unseen but for a few shots of an arm and some boots. The lethal game of cat-and-mouse was famously directed by Steven Spielberg, his second feature, and one that’s a lot more impressive than some of his subsequent films. Watch it on YouTube.

matheson3.jpg

The Legend of Hell House (1973)

Matheson’s take on Shirley Jackson’s The Haunting of Hill House—four investigators in a haunted mansion—with the gain ramped up 100%. The film starts off quietly but is very soon into full-on hysteria; director John Hough finds so many eccentric camera angles you could actually calm down after this by watching a Terry Gilliam film. Meanwhile Roddy McDowell chews the scenery as though over-acting is going out of fashion. Bonuses are a grown-up Pamela Franklin (Flora in Jack Clayton’s superb The Innocents), and a great score from Radiophonic synthesists Brian Hodgson and Delia Derbyshire. Watch the trailer.

matheson4.jpg

Trilogy of Terror (1975)

A three-story TV movie in which Karen Black took all the leading roles. No one remembers the first two stories but everyone who’s seen this remembers the third, Amelia (based on a Matheson short story, Prey), in which Ms Black is hunted in her apartment by a Zuni fetish doll. It’s on YouTube!

matheson5.jpg

Nightmare at 20,000 Feet (1983)

Sorry, Shatnerphiles, but the superior version of this story is the one from Twilight Zone: The Movie. John Lithgow is a much better actor than William Shatner, the gremlin on the wing of the plane is a fearsome creature that’s seriously destructive (not, as Matheson lamented of the original, “a surly teddy bear”), and the whole sequence is directed by George Miller fresh from Mad Max 2. The original Twilight Zone episode wasn’t bad but it can’t compete with Miller pulling out all the stops. Watch it here.

Previously on { feuilleton }
New York City abandoned

4 thoughts on “Richard Matheson, 1926–2013”

  1. I’ve just finished re-reading BID TIME RETURN last week. another great loss…

  2. Scenes from the first broadcast of “Nightmare at 20,000′” are imprinted on my mind from seeing it all those years ago. Thanks for the reference to the really sweaty Lithgow version. And isnt that Dan Ackroyd at the wheel of the ambulance?

  3. Actually, I thought that Shatner did a great job of the original Twilight Zone episode. So did Lithgow with the movie remake. The difference, I think, is that in the original, Shatner played the part of the cool, sophisticated executive (or its equivalent) who is in the unexpected role of trying to warn people of immanent danger, and who is treated as a madman for his pains. Lithgow, for his part, plays the role of an acrophobic scholar in the same position. Both perform their roles creditably.

    Of course, I hold no brief for Shatner. While I enjoyed watching Star Trek when it first came out, and I was a callow lad of 13 at the time, when one reaches a man’s estate, one tends to put away at least some of the likings of one’s youth. I would say that his one problem is that he believes that he was made for the part of Hamlet, while he would more believably play the part of Bottom in A Midsummer Night’s Dream.

    Agreed that the monster in the remake is a far more fearsome critter than in the original. The image of the beast grinning, and wagging a minatory index claw in Lithgow’s face, is etched in my memory.

    But I will remember Matheson most for his auctorial endeavors, most especially I Am Legend. May his memory be eternal.

  4. Jeff: Yes, that’s Dan Ackroyd. He’s in the opening sequence (directed by John Landis) then returns at the end.

Comments are closed.

Discover more from { feuilleton }

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading