Aug 4, 2007
Classic British cinema isn’t worthy of the name
Classic British cinema isn’t worthy of the name
Because it’s dull, reactionary and sexless; John Patterson plays my tune.
Recent posts
Noted
- Joe Orton memorialised | "Orton Square" announced in Leicester. #
- Respect for religion now makes censorship the norm #
- 50 greatest villains in literature | Lord Horror doesn't make the Telegraph's list but Cthulhu does. #
Recent work
Other work
Subscribe
- Content RSS—Straight to your reader
- Comments RSS—Add to the discussion
Stay updated via RSS.
{abstract cinema}
{animation}
{apple}
{architecture}
{art nouveau}
{art}
{beardsley}
{black and white}
{books}
{borges}
{burroughs}
{cities}
{comics}
{cormac}
{dance}
{decadence}
{design}
{electronica}
{events}
{eye candy}
{fantasy}
{fashion}
{film}
{gay}
{horror}
{illustrators}
{kubrick}
{lovecraft}
{magazines}
{miscellaneous}
{music}
{noted}
{occult}
{painting}
{photography}
{politics}
{psychedelia}
{pulp}
{religion}
{science fiction}
{science}
{sculpture}
{surrealism}
{symbolists}
{technology}
{television}
{theatre}
{typography}
{wordpress}
{work}
“feed your head”
No Comments, Comment or Ping
Reply to ‘Classic British cinema isn’t worthy of the name’