{"id":1290,"date":"2007-01-19T00:32:23","date_gmt":"2007-01-19T00:32:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/?p=1290"},"modified":"2008-07-19T23:41:06","modified_gmt":"2008-07-19T22:41:06","slug":"further-back-and-faster","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/2007\/01\/19\/further-back-and-faster\/","title":{"rendered":"Further back and faster"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/01\/jagger_beaton.jpg\" alt=\"jagger_beaton.jpg\" id=\"image1291\" \/><\/p>\n<p><em>Mick Jagger by Cecil Beaton (1968). <\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Donald Cammell thought Mick Jagger to be a more provocative rock star than Elvis Presley because Jagger was willing to experiment with his masculinity. Elvis, although extraordinarily erotic to a generation of young women, never did. What this difference suggests, among other things, is that Mick Jagger&#8217;s appeal is not Elvis&#8217;s\u2014and never was. Critic Greil Marcus has argued that what Elvis did was to purge the Sunday morning sobriety from folk and country music and to purge the dread from blues; in doing so, he transformed a regional music into a national music, and invented party music. Elvis popularized an amalgam of musical forms and styles into \u201crock&#8217;n&#8217;roll,\u201d a black American euphemism for sexual intercourse. What the Rolling Stones did to rock music, some years after Elvis made sex an integral part of its appeal, was to infuse rock with a bohemian theatricality, at first through Brian Jones, who was the first British pop star to cultivate actively a flamboyant, androgynous image. For a time, Brian even found his female double in Anita Pallenberg. Brian Jones and the Stones thus re-introduced into rock music its erotic allure, and hence made it threatening (again).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>From <a href=\"http:\/\/www.drkrm.com\/cammell1.html#alien\" target=\"_blank\">an excellent piece<\/a> by Sam Umland for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.drkrm.com\/cammell1.html\" target=\"_blank\">PERFORMANCE: A Photographic Exhibition featuring the work of Donald Cammell and Nicolas Roeg<\/a> at the Drkrm. Gallery, Los Angeles, opening on January 20th. Umland wrote the recent biography of Donald Cammell with Rebecca Umland (published by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fabpress.com\/vsearch.php?CO=FAB072\" target=\"_blank\">Fab Press<\/a>) for which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/2006\/05\/06\/new-work-out-this-month\/\">I designed the cover<\/a>. Featured in the exhibition are prints from the Del Valle Archive, including eleven photographs of Mick Jagger taken by Cecil Beaton when <em>Performance<\/em> was being filmed.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/01\/performance.jpg\" id=\"image1292\" alt=\"performance.jpg\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;When are Warner Brothers going to do the right thing and release <em>Performance<\/em> on DVD?&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/2006\/04\/09\/borges-in-performance\/\">I asked<\/a> in April last year. Well now they are, although it remains to be seen which version of the film has been used; several exist, some of them shorter than others. Release is scheduled for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Performance-James-Fox\/dp\/B000JYW5EG\/\" target=\"_blank\">February 13th in the US<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.co.uk\/Performance\/dp\/B000KCI92E\/\" target=\"_blank\">March 12th in the UK<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.drkrm.com\/cammell1.html\" target=\"_blank\">PERFORMANCE: A Photographic Exhibition<br \/>\nfeaturing the work of Donald Cammell and Nicolas Roeg<\/a><br \/>\nJanuary 20-February 24, 2007<br \/>\nDrkrm. Gallery<br \/>\n2121 San Fernando Road<br \/>\nSuite 3<br \/>\nLos Angeles<br \/>\nCA 90065<\/p>\n<p>Previously on { feuilleton }<br \/>\n\u2022 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/2006\/06\/17\/quite-a-performance\/\">Quite a performance<\/a><br \/>\n\u2022 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/2006\/04\/09\/borges-in-performance\/\">Borges in Performance<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mick Jagger by Cecil Beaton (1968). Donald Cammell thought Mick Jagger to be a more provocative rock star than Elvis Presley because Jagger was willing to experiment with his masculinity. Elvis, although extraordinarily erotic to a generation of young women, never did. What this difference suggests, among other things, is that Mick Jagger&#8217;s appeal is &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/2007\/01\/19\/further-back-and-faster\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Further back and faster&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[7,3,12,23],"tags":[419,7463,854,371,5078,2741,6300,1629,306,176],"class_list":["post-1290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-film","category-music","category-photography","category-work","tag-anita-pallenberg","tag-brian-jones","tag-cecil-beaton","tag-donald-cammell","tag-elvis-presley","tag-fab-press","tag-greil-marcus","tag-mick-jagger","tag-nicolas-roeg","tag-the-rolling-stones"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pq7rV-kO","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1290"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1290\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.johncoulthart.com\/feuilleton\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}