<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The World&#8217;s Greatest Detective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2008/02/21/the-worlds-greatest-detective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2008/02/21/the-worlds-greatest-detective/</link>
	<description>• • • Being a journal by artist and designer John Coulthart, cataloguing interests, obsessions and passing enthusiasms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:18:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2008/02/21/the-worlds-greatest-detective/comment-page-1/#comment-58621</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=2859#comment-58621</guid>
		<description>Hi Troy. Different books serve different purposes and these would certainly be easier to carry around when travelling than a collected edition. I should also have mentioned that they&#039;re well presented otherwise, with textured card covers and good paper and printing inside. I think Sherlock Holmes can stand a degree of sensationalism after years of creeping reverence. These were popular tales, after all, not high-flying literary works. 

I&#039;ve never considered doing anything with Holmes myself since there&#039;s been more than enough of that already. Unless you can think of a new approach--and have an outlet for it--it doesn&#039;t seem worthwhile. Regarding the hound here, it doesn&#039;t necessarily have to be seen as a depiction of the real beast in the story, it could easily be a depiction of the legendary apparition, in which case any exaggeration is fitting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Troy. Different books serve different purposes and these would certainly be easier to carry around when travelling than a collected edition. I should also have mentioned that they&#8217;re well presented otherwise, with textured card covers and good paper and printing inside. I think Sherlock Holmes can stand a degree of sensationalism after years of creeping reverence. These were popular tales, after all, not high-flying literary works. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never considered doing anything with Holmes myself since there&#8217;s been more than enough of that already. Unless you can think of a new approach&#8211;and have an outlet for it&#8211;it doesn&#8217;t seem worthwhile. Regarding the hound here, it doesn&#8217;t necessarily have to be seen as a depiction of the real beast in the story, it could easily be a depiction of the legendary apparition, in which case any exaggeration is fitting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2008/02/21/the-worlds-greatest-detective/comment-page-1/#comment-58566</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=2859#comment-58566</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I must say I find these a little too... sensational and gaudy. And besides, Penguin will rape you on the price of each book, when it would be better just to get  a single volume complete set. And yet again, another illustration of the Hound of the Baskervilles looking too wolfish, and highly inaccurate. Sorry if I&#039;m being a bit persnickety, but incorrect illustrations (particularly of the hound- there are so many) are one of pet peeves. 

I&#039;m quite happy that you didn&#039;t make these, so I can remain fully satisfied with every piece of John Coulthart art I&#039;ve seen. I would find it quite interesting to see your artistic take on the eerie, dark Baskerville Hall and the mysterious Hound. Has the thought ever crossed your mind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I must say I find these a little too&#8230; sensational and gaudy. And besides, Penguin will rape you on the price of each book, when it would be better just to get  a single volume complete set. And yet again, another illustration of the Hound of the Baskervilles looking too wolfish, and highly inaccurate. Sorry if I&#8217;m being a bit persnickety, but incorrect illustrations (particularly of the hound- there are so many) are one of pet peeves. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite happy that you didn&#8217;t make these, so I can remain fully satisfied with every piece of John Coulthart art I&#8217;ve seen. I would find it quite interesting to see your artistic take on the eerie, dark Baskerville Hall and the mysterious Hound. Has the thought ever crossed your mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
