<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Weirdsley Daubery&#8221;: Beardsley and Punch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/10/11/weirdsley-daubery-beardsley-and-punch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/10/11/weirdsley-daubery-beardsley-and-punch/</link>
	<description>• • • Being a journal by artist and designer John Coulthart, cataloguing interests, obsessions and passing enthusiasms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:50:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/10/11/weirdsley-daubery-beardsley-and-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-37898</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=2449#comment-37898</guid>
		<description>Yes, there were about twenty or so in the Nichols set, many of which still turn up in books credited as being by Beardsley himself. They&#039;re variable quality; most are very bad, some are are outright copies of Alphonse Mucha pictures, but a couple are passable. One of the best is a portrait of Whistler walking with a long cane. The Wilde portrait is ridiculous since it&#039;s copied from a photo of Wilde; Beardsley never used photos in that way.

Worst example I&#039;ve seen of their use recently was in a set of Taschen postcards which included two or three of the poor ones. Whoever edited that wasn&#039;t doing their job properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, there were about twenty or so in the Nichols set, many of which still turn up in books credited as being by Beardsley himself. They&#8217;re variable quality; most are very bad, some are are outright copies of Alphonse Mucha pictures, but a couple are passable. One of the best is a portrait of Whistler walking with a long cane. The Wilde portrait is ridiculous since it&#8217;s copied from a photo of Wilde; Beardsley never used photos in that way.</p>
<p>Worst example I&#8217;ve seen of their use recently was in a set of Taschen postcards which included two or three of the poor ones. Whoever edited that wasn&#8217;t doing their job properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mythicalbeast</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/10/11/weirdsley-daubery-beardsley-and-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-37889</link>
		<dc:creator>Mythicalbeast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=2449#comment-37889</guid>
		<description>Here are a couple of other AVB fakes I found this morning, along with a brief article. Never seen the Wilde or Whistler ones before, but the other two are fairly well known.

http://www.victorianweb.org/art/illustration/beardsley/forgery.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are a couple of other AVB fakes I found this morning, along with a brief article. Never seen the Wilde or Whistler ones before, but the other two are fairly well known.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.victorianweb.org/art/illustration/beardsley/forgery.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.victorianweb.org/art/illustration/beardsley/forgery.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/10/11/weirdsley-daubery-beardsley-and-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-37615</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=2449#comment-37615</guid>
		<description>Heh, yes. And he made the point in one of his self-portraits where he has a very phallic haircut:

http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=65965&amp;rendTypeId=4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, yes. And he made the point in one of his self-portraits where he has a very phallic haircut:</p>
<p><a href="http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=65965&amp;rendTypeId=4" rel="nofollow">http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=65965&amp;rendTypeId=4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thombeau</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/10/11/weirdsley-daubery-beardsley-and-punch/comment-page-1/#comment-37612</link>
		<dc:creator>Thombeau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=2449#comment-37612</guid>
		<description>My favorite Beardsley quote: &quot;Even my teeth are a little phallic.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite Beardsley quote: &#8220;Even my teeth are a little phallic.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
