<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The art of John Austen, 1886–1948</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/</link>
	<description>• • • Being a journal by artist and designer John Coulthart, cataloguing interests, obsessions and passing enthusiasms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:07:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Rage to Live: The Life of Richard Burton &#9733; Absinthe Chamber - Art Blog &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-85479</link>
		<dc:creator>A Rage to Live: The Life of Richard Burton &#9733; Absinthe Chamber - Art Blog &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-85479</guid>
		<description>[...] (images from www.johncoulthart.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (images from <a href="http://www.johncoulthart.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.johncoulthart.com</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-84801</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-84801</guid>
		<description>i would have to disagree with your statement of him being better than Alastair.
maybe it is because I am a huge fan but also because Alastair&#039;s drawings are about poetry and dramatics. this artist is talented but better than Alastair? no</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would have to disagree with your statement of him being better than Alastair.<br />
maybe it is because I am a huge fan but also because Alastair&#8217;s drawings are about poetry and dramatics. this artist is talented but better than Alastair? no</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Jasso</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-76585</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Jasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-76585</guid>
		<description>I have 3 antique John Austen posters depicting Shakespearean drama.  One is slightly (barely noticeable) water stained. These are originals. First $15,000 (U.S.) takes them. Please inquire at (915) 309-0947 or at: pablojasso@elp.rr.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 3 antique John Austen posters depicting Shakespearean drama.  One is slightly (barely noticeable) water stained. These are originals. First $15,000 (U.S.) takes them. Please inquire at (915) 309-0947 or at: <a href="mailto:pablojasso@elp.rr.com">pablojasso@elp.rr.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-44976</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-44976</guid>
		<description>Hi Heather. I&#039;m afraid that what I know about John Austen is limited to what you see here and the links above, of which the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bpib.com/illustrat/austen.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bud Plant&lt;/a&gt; one is the most informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Heather. I&#8217;m afraid that what I know about John Austen is limited to what you see here and the links above, of which the <a href="http://www.bpib.com/illustrat/austen.htm" rel="nofollow">Bud Plant</a> one is the most informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Mansfield</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-44972</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Mansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-44972</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve recently acquired a John Austen printed, signed and titled &quot;Paris&quot;, no.1 of an ed of 25, not dated. Can you tell me more about it? I would suggest it&#039;s a later work - very strong and clearly not at all influenced by Beardsley!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently acquired a John Austen printed, signed and titled &#8220;Paris&#8221;, no.1 of an ed of 25, not dated. Can you tell me more about it? I would suggest it&#8217;s a later work &#8211; very strong and clearly not at all influenced by Beardsley!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Jasso</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-28883</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Jasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-28883</guid>
		<description>I am looking for vintage posters by John Austen, particularly those designed for Shakespearean drama. Any idea where I can find these? Please relay info to: lajasso@swbell.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking for vintage posters by John Austen, particularly those designed for Shakespearean drama. Any idea where I can find these? Please relay info to: <a href="mailto:lajasso@swbell.net">lajasso@swbell.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-26530</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-26530</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve no idea where you&#039;d find posters of Austen&#039;s work seeing as he&#039;s a rather neglected artist now. The pictures here are some of the few I&#039;ve seen anywhere. If posters existed I would have been happy to make a link to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve no idea where you&#8217;d find posters of Austen&#8217;s work seeing as he&#8217;s a rather neglected artist now. The pictures here are some of the few I&#8217;ve seen anywhere. If posters existed I would have been happy to make a link to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo Jasso</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-26260</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo Jasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 05:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-26260</guid>
		<description>Where can I get John Austen art posters depicting scenes from Shakespeare&#039;s plays? Please advise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where can I get John Austen art posters depicting scenes from Shakespeare&#8217;s plays? Please advise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-17085</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-17085</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s &#039;Selected Poems of Algernon Charles Swinburne&#039;. 1928 published by The Bodley Head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8216;Selected Poems of Algernon Charles Swinburne&#8217;. 1928 published by The Bodley Head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiley</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-17082</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-17082</guid>
		<description>What is the title of the Swineburne Volume, out of curiosity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the title of the Swineburne Volume, out of curiosity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-17057</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-17057</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a reprint of the Faust drawings but it&#039;s not so good with the colour pictures which have simply been copied straight from faded printings. The colour work in my other Clarke books is a lot brighter.

And I have a first edition of his Swinburne volume but the swine who owned that before me chopped out the colour plates so it&#039;s missing some of the best drawings, a common problem with old illustrated books. Always check first if you see something for sale! Still nice to have though as the black and white printing is very sharp and clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a reprint of the Faust drawings but it&#8217;s not so good with the colour pictures which have simply been copied straight from faded printings. The colour work in my other Clarke books is a lot brighter.</p>
<p>And I have a first edition of his Swinburne volume but the swine who owned that before me chopped out the colour plates so it&#8217;s missing some of the best drawings, a common problem with old illustrated books. Always check first if you see something for sale! Still nice to have though as the black and white printing is very sharp and clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiley</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-17051</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 15:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-17051</guid>
		<description>Yeah I have a smaller edition of the old Faust book with Clarke&#039;s pictures pictures in it. I&#039;d look for the larger editions but they&#039;re too expensive. I could easily see Jodorowsky being inspired by such illustrations, if any of those rumors about another movie are true, but I&#039;ve also heard marilyn manson wants a part, and that is more than a little discouraging. If Ken Russell had made a few of his odder movies with a larger budget, the imagery would have matched up pretty well with Faust&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I have a smaller edition of the old Faust book with Clarke&#8217;s pictures pictures in it. I&#8217;d look for the larger editions but they&#8217;re too expensive. I could easily see Jodorowsky being inspired by such illustrations, if any of those rumors about another movie are true, but I&#8217;ve also heard marilyn manson wants a part, and that is more than a little discouraging. If Ken Russell had made a few of his odder movies with a larger budget, the imagery would have matched up pretty well with Faust&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-17032</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-17032</guid>
		<description>Wiley: some art of this era is a lot more grotesque than people realise, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grandmasgraphics.com/clarke4.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Harry Clarke&#039;s Faust drawings&lt;/a&gt; being a wonderful (and, at the time, controversial) example of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wiley: some art of this era is a lot more grotesque than people realise, <a href="http://www.grandmasgraphics.com/clarke4.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Harry Clarke&#8217;s Faust drawings</a> being a wonderful (and, at the time, controversial) example of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-17031</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 12:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-17031</guid>
		<description>Taschen might have done a book about artists from this period at one time but I doubt they would now, more&#039;s the pity. They seem to have narrowed their focus to popular names and contemporary art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taschen might have done a book about artists from this period at one time but I doubt they would now, more&#8217;s the pity. They seem to have narrowed their focus to popular names and contemporary art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rik Rawling</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-17005</link>
		<dc:creator>Rik Rawling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 09:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-17005</guid>
		<description>John

Thanks for these - absolutely excellent. Here&#039;s a man, like Beardsley, unafraid to leave some SPACE in his work. I agree, not as original, elegant nor as demented (I&#039;m thinking the Rue Morgue illo here) as Harry Clarke could be, but still infused with the stark power that only black &amp; white illustrations retain.
This material begs for a handsome book collection - come on Taschen, sort it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John</p>
<p>Thanks for these &#8211; absolutely excellent. Here&#8217;s a man, like Beardsley, unafraid to leave some SPACE in his work. I agree, not as original, elegant nor as demented (I&#8217;m thinking the Rue Morgue illo here) as Harry Clarke could be, but still infused with the stark power that only black &amp; white illustrations retain.<br />
This material begs for a handsome book collection &#8211; come on Taschen, sort it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiley</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/05/23/the-art-of-john-austen-1886-1948/comment-page-1/#comment-16992</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1881#comment-16992</guid>
		<description>The hack director&#039;s and &quot;artists&quot; in general of today, and keep in mind I say in general John, lack the power and intuition, that is to say, to be tune with their senses from graphic to subtle, not to mention the skill necessary to show what is commonly seen as atrocity in its bloody seductiveness at a most innocent level. Especially up top, with what appear to be severed women&#039;s heads presented in a format suited for books of beddy-bye tales for tykes. 

Such books are often beautiful, but I am unable to force continuing interest (yes, I am a hick by definition, guilty as charged), unless their attractive format is used to depict particular things I find very pleasing to the eye, things that most parents think would shock or harm their children, regardless of their stances or leanings. I could speak for most young men I know personally, to say that most boys probably think of some beastly shit before they ever consider silly, equally irrational adult things like finding the girl of their dreams or any of the other crap used in day care propaganda films.

Back to my original thought, there aren&#039;t nearly people who can be considered spellbindingly creative with death. Everyone&#039;s talking to me about Saw or Hostel sequels, and the directors can kiss my ass as far as I am concerned because they&#039;re nothing more than sub par recyclers of ground already long broken, yet gaining all the credit because subtitles and foreign languages hurt yuppies&#039; heads. Ah, we all know, its these people and their nano-second attention spans who ultimately determine what constitutes a great storyline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hack director&#8217;s and &#8220;artists&#8221; in general of today, and keep in mind I say in general John, lack the power and intuition, that is to say, to be tune with their senses from graphic to subtle, not to mention the skill necessary to show what is commonly seen as atrocity in its bloody seductiveness at a most innocent level. Especially up top, with what appear to be severed women&#8217;s heads presented in a format suited for books of beddy-bye tales for tykes. </p>
<p>Such books are often beautiful, but I am unable to force continuing interest (yes, I am a hick by definition, guilty as charged), unless their attractive format is used to depict particular things I find very pleasing to the eye, things that most parents think would shock or harm their children, regardless of their stances or leanings. I could speak for most young men I know personally, to say that most boys probably think of some beastly shit before they ever consider silly, equally irrational adult things like finding the girl of their dreams or any of the other crap used in day care propaganda films.</p>
<p>Back to my original thought, there aren&#8217;t nearly people who can be considered spellbindingly creative with death. Everyone&#8217;s talking to me about Saw or Hostel sequels, and the directors can kiss my ass as far as I am concerned because they&#8217;re nothing more than sub par recyclers of ground already long broken, yet gaining all the credit because subtitles and foreign languages hurt yuppies&#8217; heads. Ah, we all know, its these people and their nano-second attention spans who ultimately determine what constitutes a great storyline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
