<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Angelic Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/02/16/the-angelic-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/02/16/the-angelic-conversation/</link>
	<description>• • • Being a journal by artist and designer John Coulthart, cataloguing interests, obsessions and passing enthusiasms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:07:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/02/16/the-angelic-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-8754</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1490#comment-8754</guid>
		<description>Yes, Shadow is one of a number of films from the late 70s/early 80s that Jarman shot at very slow speed on a Super-8 camera with the image later transferred to 35mm, same as with parts of Angelic Conversation. They have a grainy, dreamlike quality which makes them more like moving paintings than films; for most filmgoers I&#039;m sure they&#039;d seem boring or pretentious or both. I say bollocks to the majority view, I love them. 

Shadow is one of the best as it features people engaged in strange primal rituals involving fire and mirrors and is famous for having a soundtrack by industrial noise-mongers Throbbing Gristle. Here&#039;s hoping the BFI gets round to releasing these shorter works at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Shadow is one of a number of films from the late 70s/early 80s that Jarman shot at very slow speed on a Super-8 camera with the image later transferred to 35mm, same as with parts of Angelic Conversation. They have a grainy, dreamlike quality which makes them more like moving paintings than films; for most filmgoers I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;d seem boring or pretentious or both. I say bollocks to the majority view, I love them. </p>
<p>Shadow is one of the best as it features people engaged in strange primal rituals involving fire and mirrors and is famous for having a soundtrack by industrial noise-mongers Throbbing Gristle. Here&#8217;s hoping the BFI gets round to releasing these shorter works at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiley</title>
		<link>http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/2007/02/16/the-angelic-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-8745</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johncoulthart.com/feuilleton/?p=1490#comment-8745</guid>
		<description>The first time I&#039;d ever heard of Derek Jarman, was on some obscure comic artist&#039;s website and he raved about a move called &#039;In the Shadow of the Sun&#039; ,  also by Derek Jarman I believe. When I initially looked for it I found few mentions of it elsewhere. I haven&#039;t checked on it for so long, but this roused my curiosity. Have you seen it by chance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time I&#8217;d ever heard of Derek Jarman, was on some obscure comic artist&#8217;s website and he raved about a move called &#8216;In the Shadow of the Sun&#8217; ,  also by Derek Jarman I believe. When I initially looked for it I found few mentions of it elsewhere. I haven&#8217;t checked on it for so long, but this roused my curiosity. Have you seen it by chance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
